100 free local sex chat - Backdating options sec

Another consequence is that the company underrepresents the real nature of an executive’s compensation, perpetuating the myth that options are performance-based incentive compensation.The backdating problem was first highlighted by Professor Erik Lie of the University of Iowa, who published his initial study in 2004.The allegations of illicit sex, drugs, and rock and roll reminded me of the 60s ... Sure, Broadcom had to take a .2 billion charge to fix the accounting mess left by the company's former executives.

backdating options sec-45

As a consequence, the option is immediately profitable, or “in the money,” to the option holder.

All stemming from the practice known as “options backdating.” Options backdating occurs when a company issues stock options on one date, but reports in its financials an earlier issue date to create a “strike” or exercise price equal to the earlier date’s lower price.

Jasper signed all of Maxim’s filings with the SEC at that time.

Liability was found in the Maxim case partly because backdating and a failure to expense the practice were proven, Fickes notes.

Weili Dai, co-founder of the Silicon Valley firm and former chief operating officer, was also accused of playing a role in the backdating scheme and will pay $500,000 to settle the claims filed in the U. District Court for the Northern District of California. Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.

In researching this post, I came across a number of recent reports on Henry Nicholas III, the once high-flying CEO and cofounder of Broadcom. While the story was enthralling, I didn't understand what any of it had to do with a federal investigation into stock option backdating.

Professor Lie concluded that the robust profitability of so many options was statistically impossible absent some artificial influence such as backdating.

Subsequently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took an interest, followed by the securities plaintiffs’ bar and many corporations. The practice of options backdating, apparently widespread from 1996 through 2002, is widely believed to have been short-circuited by the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley in 2002.

That means the company incurs an expense equal to the difference in the share price between the two dates.

Fifty-two companies currently under criminal investigation. Moreover, the company avoids having to expense the options as current compensation, thus increasing earnings in the near term.

Said another way, do the feds really need to dig that deep to find enough rope to hang executives with?

Tags: , ,